Work meetings are part of the daily life of all professionals. Nowadays, we invent meetings for everything. In recent years, this work mechanism has become the main resource of organizations for planning, solving problems, assigning tasks and evaluating results. The agendas of executives and business leaders have been transformed into a kind of Tetris in which accommodating the greatest number of meetings is the challenge. We all suffer from “meetingitis” and there are few of us who dare to question their efficiency, those of us who care about perfecting them and, above all, those of us who propose to evaluate their contribution to business.
The excess in this collaborative work mechanism
Poorly managed meetings quickly become a business database waste of time, a threat to productivity, and an obstacle to achieving goals. The excess in this collaborative work mechanism has gradually become an excuse to dilute authority, to blur responsibility and to delay decisions. In companies, it is common for meetings to be scheduled without being clear about a problem or the situation that needs to be resolved, ignoring – those who cite them – that the meetings should be held to work on issues that cannot be resolved individually or with asynchronous collaborative processes. .
The meetings themselves are not the
Even with the above said, meetings Taiwan Database are necessary for socialization and problem solving, and for evangelization from leaders to collaborators. This leads us to conclude that the problem is not the method, but who uses it. The meetings themselves are not the cause of unproductivity, what causes inefficiency is whoever schedules a meeting without a clear goal or who abuses this way of working.
